The Darkness (1900).
Another discovery to add to the long list of post-Beardsley illustrators, John Jack Vrieslander was a German artist whose not-very-German name was a pseudonym of Hans Zarth. It took some searching to establish that a) it is Zarth, not “Zahrt” as one site has it, and b) the two were indeed one person. I’ve used the Vrieslander name here since that’s the credit used for most of these examples. Vrieslander/Zarth signed his pictures with a V or a Z according to the prevailing persona.
As Beardsley imitations go these drawings could be better—they lack Aubrey’s natural sense of balance and composition—but they’re of interest for leaning so heavily on the style of the later illustrations which favour elegant gardens and meticulously rendered foliage. Some of the figures refer to the earlier Aubrey, however, as does the vaguely lascivious atmosphere. The phallic plant pot in the Lilly Peters picture below is the kind of detail nobody in 1901 would have dared attempt without Aubrey’s lead.
Fanfare (1900).
Young Mother (1900).
Variété (1901).
One of six drawings from a small book collection.
Pierrot and Colombine (1914).
Vrieslander’s later drawings and etchings evolved to a more Pointillist style. This is from Rose Mirliton, a book that featured 20 illustrations in all. The drawing of Salomé below (with a rather flat head of Jokanaan on the platter), is from the same series, and may owe something to Maud Allan‘s performances.
Salomé (1914).
Ex Libris Hans Zarth.
Elsewhere on { feuilleton }
• The illustrators archive
they lack Aubrey’s natural sense of balance and composition
Were he alive today, he’d be drawing for DC Comics.
Just found this on ebay. Not seen his work before – thought you might like it http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/1st-1921-John-Austen-LITTLE-APE-Art-Nouveau-AUBREY-BEARDSLEY-Harry-Clarke-DECO-/371194647436?pt=Antiquarian_Books_UK&hash=item566cecd38c
More here: http://cvicworks.blogspot.co.uk/2011/09/john-austen-i-everyman.html
And here:
http://www.fulltable.com/vts/aoi/a/austen/z.htm
Yes, John Austen is pretty well-known although it’s mainly the Hamlet drawings that you see:
http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/2013/06/17/john-austens-hamlet/
I’ve not seen Little Ape before.